What might constitute continuous use of property in adverse possession claims?

In adverse possession claims, continuous use of property refers to the requirement that the claimant must utilize the property in a manner that is uninterrupted and consistent for a defined statutory period, which in Minnesota is generally 15 years. This means the individual must demonstrate that they have been using the property as if they were the true owner, without significant gaps in use, and in a way that is observable and may be inferred to be exclusive.

Continuous use signifies that the use must not only occur but must also be of a nature and duration that is adequate to make it clear that the claimant is asserting ownership rights. This could involve maintaining the property, residing on it, or using it for activities typical to the area. The idea is that such use should demonstrate a claim to ownership that is openly acknowledged and recognized by others, including the original owner.

The other options do not meet the legal standards necessary for adverse possession. For instance, seasonal use would not fulfill the requirement for continuous possession, as it does not indicate a consistent and uninterrupted claim. Similarly, using the property with permission from the original owner negates any adverse claim, as this implies the original owner's consent. Minimal use, even if agreed upon by neighbors, also fails to satisfy the requirement for continuous and uninterrupted